01 April, 2015

Lanvin Eclat d'Arpege Review

Quick note: I am currently traveling and blogging from the road, and all of my makeup were shipped to my new home ahead of time, except for a few very basic items. Thus, I do not have them on hand to photograph or review. However, I have a box of over 100 perfume samples, so most of my blog posts will be perfume reviews until I am finished with my travel. As perfume samples are very boring to photograph and view, all of the pictures featured are official photos from the manufacturers, unless otherwise noted.

Have you ever smelled a perfume so underwhelming that you were left wondering why did they even bother to make it in the first place?

That was how I felt after I had sprayed on Lanvin's Eclat D'Arpege.

Now, where do I even start? Touted as a modernized reformulation of the 1927 scent -- Arpege, the house of Lanvin claims that Eclat D'Arpege is adapted to reflect the spontaneity of the modern woman.

Sadly, it smells like violet water and nothing more. Is it pretty? Yes. Is it pleasant? Absolutely. However, Eclat D'Arpege is so forgettable and indistinguishable from flowery cologne splashes out there, that I don't see the point or reason for its existence. Smelling this, one can easily tell that the house of Lanvin was trying to compete with the modern florals from Marc Jacobs. The difference is that when you smell a Marc Jacobs perfume, you can immediately tell what you're smelling. With Eclat D'Arpege, it could might as well be a generic after-bath cologne from the supermarket. 

There is nothing about this perfume that immediately identifies itself, unlike the instantly recognizable classics such as Chanel No. 5, Shalimar, or even a modern classic like Daisy. Whether we love or hate those perfumes, we can at least agree that they are iconic and recognizable. Eclat D'Arpege, on the other hand, is a waste of time.

The lasting power is also very weak, as it fades away within the same hour.

According to its manufacturer, Lanvin Eclat D'Arpege is a blend of lemon leaves, lilac, osmanthus, peach blossom, peony, wisteria, tea, cedarwood, amber, and musks.

Have you ever been disappointed by a perfume? What was it?
If you have a blog, feel free to leave a link with your comment; I'd love to visit! :o)


  1. If it's not remarkable, like someone identifies it immediately... and the lasting power is also not good, I am glad I didn't fall on the trap :) I won;t be buying it :)

  2. Oh wow, I would expect MUCH MORE from Lanvin! Thanks for the heads up on this, will be giving it a miss for sure.

    Shireen | Reflection of Sanity

  3. Hmm I also expected a lot more from Lanvin! Thanks for the review lady :)

    Sarah x

  4. what a pretty bottle, shame you didnt get on with the scent! There are some floral perfumes I love but generally theyre my least favourite scent, and I'm much more excited by sweet and fruity fragrances x

  5. Hey, I would like to invite you to my blog! I would be so happy if we support each other on Bloglovin, Instagram, Facebook and maybe GFC! Just let me know when you do so!

    Blog | Facebook Page | Bloglovin | Instagram

  6. Oh that's so disappointing :( I completely know what you mean though! I always test out perfumes on myself for a good few times everytime I go shopping just to see how they are and how long they last on me... I've been disappointed too many times before!

    Great post :)
    Charlotte xxx

  7. Thank you for the heads up. Seems terrible. Great packaging though.

    Jessica | notjessfashion.com


Thank you so much for sharing your opinion. I take the time to read all comments, and respond to questions. Feel free to leave a blog link with your comments, but please don't simply spam with just links and nothing else. Thanks!

© Copyright. Chic and Alluring